Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Absorption and translocation of 14 C-glyphosate [ N -(phosphonomethyl)glycine] by moisture-stressed common milkweed ( Asclepias syriaca L. ♯ ASCSY) was studied in greenhouse and growth chamber experiments. Water-stressed [13% (w/w) soil moisture] common milkweed plants treated with glyphosate at 1.1 kg ae/ha produced shoot regrowth equal to untreated plants, whereas shoot regrowth of nonstressed [25% (w/w) soil moisture] glyphosate-treated plants was only 6% of untreated plants. All shoot regrowth originated from buds on the proximal half of roots. Common milkweed plants, maintained at 25% soil moisture, absorbed 44% of the 14 C-glyphosate applied and translocated 20% from the treated leaf, whereas plants at 13% soil moisture absorbed 29% and translocated 7%. Wiping the leaf with tissue paper wetted with distilled water or chloroform prior to 14 C-glyphosate application increased absorption from 35 (unwiped leaves) to 62 and 77%, respectively, for plants at 25% soil moisture, and increased absorption from 14 to 42 and 46%, respectively, for plants at 13% soil moisture. Wiping failed to increase translocation out of the treated leaf for plants at either soil moisture regime. Latex samples taken from the abaxial leaf surface opposite 14 C-glyphosate-treated leaves and from petioles of treated leaves did not contain 14 C, indicating that glyphosate did not enter laticifers. Proximal root buds accumulated less 14 C-radioactivity than distal root buds and had lower respiratory rates, suggesting that proximal root buds are more dormant than distal root buds and thus accumulate less glyphosate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Waldecker et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: