In the first study, selective sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim blood agar (SXT-BA) and conventional blood agar (BA) plates incubated under CO2 and anaerobically were compared for their ability to recover group A streptococci from throat cultures. Recovery rates were: SXT-BA (anaerobic), 100%; SXT-BA (CO2), 98%; BA (anaerobic), 89.2%; and BA (CO2), 76.5%. Primary plate bacitracin test results could be read on significantly more of the SXT-BA plates. Readability rates were: SXT-BA (anaerobic), 97%; SXT-BA (CO2), 96%; BA (anaerobic), 70.6%; and BA (CO2), 32.4%. A second study compared with the SXT-BA method versus a BA-double-disk (BA-DD) method which utilizes conventional media with addition of a bacitracin differentiation and a sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim susceptibility disk placed adjacent to one another in the heavy area of inoculation. Isolation rates were: SXT-BA, 100% and BA-DD, 88%. Readability rates for direct bacitracin tests were: SXT-BA, 92% and BA-DD, 76.2%. In our hands, the SXT-BA method was superior for yielding highest isolation rates and for yielding highest readability rates of direct bacitracin test results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kurzynski et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: