Why the study?
Do endothelin receptor antagonists reduce ischemia-reperfusion-induced intestinal mucosal injury in a preclinical model?
Do endothelin receptor antagonists reduce ischemia-reperfusion-induced intestinal mucosal injury in a preclinical model?
Endothelin receptor antagonism attenuates ischemia-reperfusion-induced intestinal mucosal injury, likely by improving disturbed blood flow during reperfusion.
Endothelin receptor antagonism may protect against intestinal I/R injury in animals; leaves open translation to human therapy.
The aim of the present study was to assess the role of endothelin (ET) in ischemia-reperfusion (I/R)-induced mucosal injury. Mucosal permeability ((51)Cr-EDTA clearance) and tissue myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity were significantly increased after 30 min of ischemia followed by 30 min of reperfusion. The I/R-induced increases in mucosal permeability and polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) infiltration were significantly attenuated by pretreatments with ET(A) (BQ-485) and/or ET(B) (BQ-788) receptor antagonists. Monoclonal antibody (MAb) directed against intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1; MAb 1A29) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) pretreatments significantly attenuated the increased mucosal permeability and PMN infiltration in a similar manner as with ET receptor antagonists. Superior mesenteric artery blood flow was significantly reduced during the reperfusion period. Both ET receptor antagonists caused a significant rise in blood flow compared with an untreated I/R group. In conclusion, our data suggest that ET(A) and/or ET(B) receptors, ICAM-1, and superoxide play an important role in I/R-induced mucosal dysfunction and PMN infiltration. Furthermore, ET is involved in the pathogenesis of post-reperfusion-induced damage and beneficial effects of ET receptor antagonism are related to an improvement of disturbed blood flow during the reperfusion period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oktar et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: