Why the study?
Does isovolumic contraction time measured by Doppler Tissue Imaging correlate with aortic stenosis severity and identify severe aortic stenosis?
Does isovolumic contraction time measured by Doppler Tissue Imaging correlate with aortic stenosis severity and identify severe aortic stenosis?
Isovolumic contraction time measured by pulsed-wave Doppler tissue imaging is prolonged in severe aortic stenosis and correlates with aortic valve area, offering a potential adjunctive echocardiographic marker of severity.
Prolonged ICT may aid severe AS identification on TDI; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation of incremental value.
BACKGROUND: Doppler Tissue Imaging (DTI) has been evaluated in ischaemic heart disease and some cardiomyopathies. In patients with aortic stenosis (AS), left ventricular contraction is slowered. This study aimed to evaluate the possible role of the measurement of isovolumic contraction time (ICT) by DTI in the evaluation of AS severity. METHODS: The study population constitutes 30 patients: 15 with AS (nine severe and six non-severe) and 15 control subjects. All of them had normal systolic function, sinus rhythm, and absence of ischaemic heart disease of conduction abnormalities. ICT was defined as the time from the onset of the QRS complex to the beginning of the DTI systolic wave. The correlation between ICT and aortic area obtained by continuity equation, as well as the diagnostic value of ICT in the identification of severe AS were studied. RESULTS: ICT was significantly increased in patients with severe AS (98+/-27 versus 65+/-21 ms, p=0.024). There was a significant correlation between ICT and aortic area (r=-0.56; p=0.035). The receiver operator characteristic curve of ICT in the identification of severe AS yielded an area under the curve of 0.852 (95% confidence interval: 0.665-1.0). The two best cut-points were >73 ms (88% sensitivity, 77% specificity) and >85 ms (78% sensitivity, 83% specificity). A value of >41 ms had a 100% sensitivity, but only a 17% specificity, and >91 ms showed a 100% specificity, but only a 44% sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: ICT measured by pulsed-wave DTI is increased in patients with aortic stenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raúl Moreno (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: