Why the study?
Does pulsed low frequency electromagnetic field therapy improve functional capacity and fall risk in patients with diabetic peripheral polyneuropathy?
Does pulsed low frequency electromagnetic field therapy improve functional capacity and fall risk in patients with diabetic peripheral polyneuropathy?
Pulsed low frequency electromagnetic field therapy improves functional capacity and reduces fall risk in patients with diabetic peripheral polyneuropathy.
Supports LFPEMFT addition to diabetic polyneuropathy care; extends RCT evidence for electromagnetic therapies.
2 Department of Physical Therapy for Musculoskeletal Disorders, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Egypt. ____________________________ Correspondence: Ashraf Abdelaal Mohamed Abdelaal , Email: drashraf_pt79@yahoo.com ABSTRACT Background: Diabetic peripheral polyneuropathy (DPN) is a major public health problem. Pulsed low frequency electromagnetic field therapy (LFPEMFT) is a form of alternative therapies used to treat a variety of health conditions including DPN, but an understanding of the LFPEMFT therapeutic efficacy on functional aspects needs further clarification. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of LFPEMFT on functional capacity (assessed through 6 minutes' walk test) and fall risk (assessed through Berg balance scale) in patients with DPN. Methodology: Eighty-Five eligible, volunteer, patients with DPN were randomly assigned into PLFEMT and Sham Electromagnetic Therapy (SEMT) groups. Both groups received treatment twice weekly for 12 weeks. Variables were evaluated pre-study (evaluation-1) and post-study (evaluation-2). Results: At evaluation-2; functional capacity and fall risk mean values and percentages of change were 438.49 ± 31.87 (15.73 %), 380.75 ± 42.77 (0.037 %) and 41.73 ± 3.22 (22.54 %), 34.05 ± 3.64 (2.02 %) for LFPEMFT and SEMT groups respectively (P < 0.05). Conclusion: PLFEMT is an effective modality in improving functional capacity and fall risk in patients with DPN.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdelaal et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: