Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper analyzes in detail the process of tomographic image reconstruction by pseudo-inversion of the blurring matrix of a PET imaging system. Eigenvector and eigenvalue decomposition is used as a method to evaluate the physical reasons for the ill-conditioned nature of the problem. It is shown that finding an accurate pseudo-inverse for even a modest PET array of 8 x 8 pixels is a difficult task for a computer with 48-bit mantissa. The problem is caused by the strong ambiguity with which the detector system measures the activity at each pixel. For a problem in which imaging with a complete detector ring is not possible, and in which invariance of the point response function cannot be maintained, the pseudo-inverse method of reconstruction is, however, shown to be very useful. Advantage is taken of the fact that the activitiy to be measured is localized in a single plane, without over-or underlying activity. A planar camera configuration yields very well conditioned matrices that are separable for a large number of useful cases. It is even possible to define pixel sizes which are considerably smaller than the detector size and solve the problem without a substantial increase in the noise magnification factor. Recognizing that the above application is equivalent to a case of very well defined time-of-flight (TOF) measurement, the simple initial PET study is reevaluated by inclusion of TOF information.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. Llacer (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: