Why the study?
Worries about spinal anesthesia may preclude its acceptance in anxious parturients, and whether propofol procedural sedation could increase the acceptance rate of spinal anesthesia for cesarean section was evaluated.
Does propofol procedural sedation increase the acceptance rate of spinal anesthesia in parturients undergoing cesarean section who initially refused it?
Does propofol procedural sedation increase the acceptance rate of spinal anesthesia in parturients undergoing cesarean section who initially refused it?
Propofol procedural sedation effectively increases the acceptance rate of spinal anesthesia among parturients undergoing cesarean section who initially refuse it, while maintaining hemodynamic stability and high patient satisfaction.
May facilitate spinal acceptance via propofol in refusing parturients; leaves open randomized confirmation before practice change.
Background Parturients are highly anxious preoperatively. The worries of spinal anesthesia may preclude its acceptance despite being recommended. Procedural sedation is not a routine during regional blocks, but it is sensible that anesthesiologists should provide their blocks comfortably. The proposal is that implementing the propofol procedural sedation (PPS) may increase the acceptance rate of spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Methods In this prospective observational study, the patients who refused spinal anesthesia primarily were interrogated to implement PPS for painless comfortable spinal anesthesia. Their acceptance rate was the primary outcome. In the sitting position, propofol 0.7 mg/kg and 20 mg increments were used as required. Patients were well supported and monitored. Data were compared by Mann-Whitney, chi-square, Fisher’s exact, and Friedman’s ANOVA tests as appropriate. Results The acceptance rate of spinal anesthesia increased from 17 to 93%. During PPS, the mean values of minimal mean blood pressure were not significantly decreased, while the mean values of the heart rate slightly increased. The minimal values of oxygen saturation showed no significant reduction compared to the basal values. Patients expressed a marked relief of anxiety and high satisfaction. Conclusion The use of propofol procedural sedation was effective in increasing the acceptance rate of spinal anesthesia during CS with safety and high patient’s satisfaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mazy et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: