Why the study?
Systolic inter-arm pressure difference is considered a cardiovascular risk, but whether its presence is associated with impaired left ventricular functions remained uncertain.
Is systolic inter-arm pressure difference associated with impaired left ventricular function in hypertensive patients?
Is systolic inter-arm pressure difference associated with impaired left ventricular function in hypertensive patients?
Systolic inter-arm pressure difference correlates with subclinical left ventricular dysfunction in hypertensive patients, highlighting its potential value in routine risk stratification.
Supports potential role of SIAD in identifying subclinical LV dysfunction; hypothesis-generating and should not change practice yet.
Background: Systolic inter-arm pressure difference (SIAD) is considered as cardiovascular risk. We aimed to ascertain whether the presence of (SIAD) is associated with impaired left ventricular (LV) functions or not. Methods: Blood pressure (BP) was measured on both arms of 81 participants, echocardiographic parameters of LV functions; ejection fraction, mitral E, A, eˋ, aˋand tricuspid regurgitant velocities, left atrial volume index, E/A and E/eˋ ratio, LV stiffness index and myocardial performance index (MPI) were measured, and global longitudinal strain (GLS) was assessed. Results: Higher SIAD level had good positive correlations with age, body mass index (BMI), duration of hypertension (HTN), MPI, and LV end-systolic volume. SIAD had good negative correlations with mitral E wave velocity, E/A ratio, eˋ and sˋ wave velocities, and with the average GLS. Impaired LV average GLS is independently associated with: Years from HTN discovery followed by BMI, gender, and age. Conclusion: BP reading in both arms on the first visit is not sufficient; hypertensive patients need evaluation of the SIAD on follow up. We need to consider the SIAD on risk stratification and BP control. This will be simple to follow in primary care and areas with low resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
El‐Dosouky et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: