Why the study?
Does greater systematic use of intensive care units improve survival outcomes or reduce costs in older surgical patients undergoing major surgeries?
Does greater systematic use of intensive care units improve survival outcomes or reduce costs in older surgical patients undergoing major surgeries?
Greater systematic use of intensive care for older surgical patients undergoing major surgeries does not improve survival outcomes, suggesting routine ICU admission may not be necessary for all major procedures.
Routine ICU admission may not reduce mortality after major surgery in older patients; leaves open selective use and cost effects in trials.
AbstractAbstract For a large cohort of patients undergoing selected major surgical procedures, there was a wide variation in intensive care unit utilization for each procedure, with no relation to mortality. Greater systematic use of intensive care for older surgical patients in the United States undergoing selected major surgeries does not improve survival outcomes. Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background Use of intensive care after major surgical procedures and whether routinely admitting patients to intensive care units (ICUs) improve outcomes or increase costs is unknown. Methods The authors examined frequency of admission to an ICU during the hospital stay for Medicare beneficiaries undergoing selected major surgical procedures: elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, cystectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, esophagectomy, and elective open AAA repair. The authors compared hospital mortality, length of stay, and Medicare payments for patients receiving each procedure in hospitals admitting patients to the ICU less than 50% of the time (low use), 50 to 89% (moderate use), and 90% or greater (high use), adjusting for patient and hospital factors. Results The cohort ranged from 7,878 patients in 162 hospitals for esophagectomies to 69,989 patients in 866 hospitals for endovascular AAA. Overall admission to ICU ranged from 35.6% (endovascular AAA) to 71.3% (open AAA). Admission to ICU across hospitals ranged from less than 5% to 100% of patients for each surgical procedure. There was no association between hospital use of intensive care and mortality for any of the five surgical procedures. There was a consistent association between high use of intensive care with longer length of hospital stay and higher Medicare payments only for endovascular AAA. Conclusions There is little consensus regarding the need for intensive care for patients undergoing major surgical procedures and no relationship between a hospital’s use of intensive care and hospital mortality. There is also no consistent relationship across surgical procedures between use of intensive care and either length of hospital stay or payments for care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wunsch et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: