Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We examined serum NCC-ST 439 for its significance as a tumor marker of large bowel cancer in 121 patients with primary and 36 with recurrent large bowel cancer. Serum NCC-ST 439 was positive in 27.3 percent of the former and 66.7 percent of the latter. It was false-positive in only 5.6 percent of patients with benign diseases. Positive serum NCC-ST 439 correlated with lymph node and liver metastases. The combination assay for NCC-ST 439, CEA, and CA19-9 was positive in 49.6 percent of the patients with primary tumors and 88.9 percent of those with recurrent tumors; in other words, the diagnostic accuracy improved. The results demonstrated that the determination of serum NCC-ST 439 in large bowel cancer might be useful in cancer staging and that NCC-ST 439, if used in combination with CEA, is particularly useful in diagnosing recurrences because of its improved diagnostic accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamaguchi et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: