Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), the rate-limiting enzyme in 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) catabolism, has been a key target for the development of novel oral fluoropyrimidines. DPD-inhibiting oral fluoropyrimidines showing promise in early clinical studies included UFT (the 5-FU prodrug, tegafur, plus the DPD substrate, uracil), eniluracil (an irreversible DPD inhibitor that improves the oral bioavailability of 5-FU) and S-1 (tegafur plus a reversible DPD inhibitor, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine, and oxonic acid). However, results from phase II/III trials evaluating these agents as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer have been disappointing. Although DPD-inhibiting oral fluoropyrimidines have some activity in colorectal cancer and oral administration provides significant convenience advantages, the inferior efficacy of UFT/leucovorin and eniluracil/5-FU versus 5-FU/leucovorin in phase III trials does not support the use of these compounds. A feasible regimen for the phase III development of S-1 outside Japan has not been defined. Thus the DPD-inhibiting oral fluoropyrimidines have failed to fulfill their early promise: clinical data indicate that none of these compounds is likely to improve outcomes for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hans‐Joachim Schmoll (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: