Why the study?
The autonomic nervous system contributes to cardiovascular diseases, and rapid, accurate parasympathetic and sympathetic measures are needed to improve patient management.
Does routine measurement of cardiac parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous systems assist in risk stratification and management of cardiovascular clinic patients?
Does routine measurement of cardiac parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous systems assist in risk stratification and management of cardiovascular clinic patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Routine measurement of cardiac autonomic function may improve risk stratification for MACE and help guide targeted therapies in cardiovascular patients.
Objective: To review our studies of the ease and importance of parasympathetic and sympathetic (P&S) measures in managing cardiovascular patients. Background: The autonomic nervous system is responsible for the development or progression of hypertension (HTN), orthostasis, coronary disease (CAD), heart failure (CHF), and arrhythmias. Finally, new technology provides us with rapid, accurate P and S measures critically needed to manage these patients much more successfully. Methods: Using the ANX 3.0 autonomic monitor, P&S activity was recorded in 4 studies: 163 heart failure patients in total, mean follow-up (f/u) 12-24.5 months; 109 orthostasis patients, f/u 2.28 years (yr), and 483 patients with risk factors or known HTN, CAD, or CHF, f/u 4.92 yrs. All were on guideline-driven therapy. Results: Fifty-nine percent (59%) of CHF patients had dangerously high sympathovagal balance(SB) or cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN), and Ranolazine markedly improved 90% of these, improved left ventricular ejection fraction in 70% of patients on average 11.3 units, and reduced MACE (acute coronary syndromes, death, acute CHF, ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation[VT/VF]) 40%. Sixty-six-percent (66%) of orthostatic patients corrected with (r) alpha lipoic acid ([r]ALA); non-responders had the lowest S-tone. In the 483 patient study, SB>2.5 best predicted MACE when compared to nuclear stress and echocardiography (sensitivity 0.59, OR 7.03 [CI 4.59-10.78], specificity 0.83, positive predictive value 0.64, and negative predictive value 0.80).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Murray et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: