Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We present a statistical survey of the latitudinal structure of the fast magnetosonic wave mode detected by the Van Allen Probes spanning the time interval of 21 September 2012 to 1 August 2014. We show that statistically, the latitudinal occurrence of the wave frequency ( f ) normalized by the local proton cyclotron frequency ( f cP ) has a distinct funnel‐shaped appearance in latitude about the magnetic equator similar to that found in case studies. By comparing the observed E/B ratios with the model E/B ratio, using the observed plasma density and background magnetic field magnitude as input to the model E/B ratio, we show that this mode is consistent with the extra‐ordinary (whistler) mode at wave normal angles ( θ k ) near 90°. Performing polarization analysis on synthetic waveforms composed from a superposition of extra‐ordinary mode plane waves with θ k randomly chosen between 87 and 90°, we show that the uncertainty in the derived wave normal is substantially broadened, with a tail extending down to θ k of 60°, suggesting that another approach is necessary to estimate the true distribution of θ k . We find that the histograms of the synthetically derived ellipticities and θ k are consistent with the observations of ellipticities and θ k derived using polarization analysis. We make estimates of the median equatorial θ k by comparing observed and model ray tracing frequency‐dependent probability occurrence with latitude and give preliminary frequency dependent estimates of the equatorial θ k distribution around noon and 4 R E , with the median of ~4 to 7° from 90° at f/f cP = 2 and dropping to ~0.5° from 90° at f/f cP = 30. The occurrence of waves in this mode peaks around noon near the equator at all radial distances, and we find that the overall intensity of these waves increases with AE* , similar to findings of other studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hospodarsky et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: