This letter response reinforces the guideline recommendation that septal reduction therapy for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy should be performed in specialized referral centers.
We appreciate the thoughtful comments from Zhangand Zeng regarding our recent study on the long-termoutcomes of septal reduction therapy (SRT) in obstruc-tive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.1 We are pleased thatour work has stimulated further discussion, and we wel-come the opportunity to address their points.Most published literature addressing the outcomeafter SRT originate from a small number of high-volumesurgical and interventional hypertrophic cardiomyopathyreferral centers or from insurance claims data with onlyin-hospital mortality data.2,3 Given this, we considered itessential to evaluate outcomes in high-volume clinicalcenters that are not primarily interventional. While includ-ing broader populations, such as those treated in com-munity settings, may provide epidemiological insights, itremains a complex issue. Current guidelines recommendthat SRT should be performed primarily in specializedreferral centers, where comprehensive clinical manage-ment, careful patient selection, and procedural expertiseare key determinants of perioperative success.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maurizi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: