Why the study?
Ischemic stroke has a high incidence and mortality, prompting investigation into the neuroprotective potential of the salidroside derivative SHPL-49.
Does oral SHPL-49 improve neurological function and reduce infarct volume in a rat model of ischemic stroke?
Does oral SHPL-49 improve neurological function and reduce infarct volume in a rat model of ischemic stroke?
Oral SHPL-49 at 90 mg/kg provides neuroprotection in a rat model of ischemic stroke by ameliorating lipid metabolism disorders and mitigating ferroptosis.
No immediate clinical implications; hypothesis-generating for SHPL-49 in human ischemic stroke.
• Oral administration of SHPL-49 confers neuroprotection in ischemic stroke rats. • SHPL-49 mitigates brain lipid metabolism disorders. • Iron-dependent ferroptosis is a central target of SHPL-49. • Preclinical evidence for oral efficacy and multi-mechanistic action. Ischemic stroke, characterized by high incidence and mortality, severely endangers human health. This study investigated the neuroprotective potential of salidroside derivative SHPL-49 (NB-SHPL-49-A-3, Supplementary Material 1). Male Sprague-Dawley rats with permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion (pMCAO) received oral SHPL-49 at 60 mg/kg and 90 mg/kg for 14 days, with Butylphthalide (NBP) as a positive control. In vivo, neurological function, infarct volume, cognitive ability, and grip strength were evaluated, and lipid metabolism and the ferroptosis-related ACSL4-GPX4 pathway were analyzed. In vitro PC12 cell oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) models were established. Results showed that 90 mg/kg SHPL-49 significantly improved neurological and cognitive functions, reduced infarct volume, regulated lipid metabolism, and inhibited ferroptosis via the ACSL4-GPX4 pathway. In conclusion, 90 mg/kg oral SHPL-49 protected against neurodegeneration and reversed lipid metabolism disorder in ischemic stroke rats.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: