BACKGROUND: To improve the diagnostic sensitivity of PTH measurements, more data on the upper limit of the reference interval for PTH levels were requested at a recent international consensus conference. As PTH levels vary inversely with plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) levels and as vitamin D insufficiency is widespread, particular attention should be given to the influence of low vitamin D levels on the PTH reference interval. AIM, DESIGN AND METHODS: In a cross-sectional design, including 2316 women aged 17-84, we determined 95% reference interval using a nonparametric approach and studied the effects of potential predictors on plasma PTH levels. RESULTS: PTH was a positive function of age, body weight and BMI and inversely associated with total daily calcium intake, smoking, plasma calcium levels and 25OHD levels, all of which explained 16% of the variability in plasma PTH levels. The threshold value for 25OHD levels below which PTH levels started to rise was 82 nmol/l. Plasma PTH levels varied inversely with the seasonal variations in 25OHD levels. Mean PTH level was 4·1 pmol/l with a reference interval equal to 2·0-8·6 pmol/l. Restricting the population in whom the reference interval was calculated to only women with 25OHD levels above 30 or 100 nmol/l lowered the upper limit of the reference interval to 8·4 and 7·1 pmol/l, respectively. Similar, stratification according to age, body mass index, smoking and calcium intake had only minor impact on the reference interval. CONCLUSION: Indices with known effects on plasma PTH levels have only a minor impact on the upper levels of the normative reference interval in women with intact renal function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rejnmark et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: