Why the study?
How can fluid responsiveness be accurately predicted in mechanically ventilated patients with acute circulatory failure?
How can fluid responsiveness be accurately predicted in mechanically ventilated patients with acute circulatory failure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review summarizes recent advances in predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients to optimize cardiac output while avoiding the risks of fluid overload.
Predicting which patients with acute circulatory failure will respond to fluid by a significant increase in cardiac output is a daily challenge, in particular in the setting of the intensive care unit (ICU). This challenge has become even more crucial because evidence is growing that administering excessive amounts of fluid is a risk factor in critically ill patients, in particular in patients with lung injury. However, some tests and indices allow prediction of fluid responsiveness before intravenous fluids are infused. In patients receiving mechanical ventilation, the arterial pulse pressure variation (PPV) has been used for many years. More recently, other tests, which may overcome some limitations of PPV, have been developed. In addition, recent studies have emphasized how the hemodynamic effects of volume expansion should be assessed once fluid has been administered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Monnet et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: