Multidimensional Evaluation of Combined Anticoagulation and Venoprotective Therapy in Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study of Clinical, Economic, and Resource Utilization Outcomes

Figures

• 

  Figure 1. Patient flow diagram and propensity score matching strategy.

• 

  Figure 2. Standardized mean differences of baseline characteristics across four matching methods.

• 

  Figure 3. Components of dataset weights across different matching methods.

• 

  Figure 4. Comparison of treatment effect estimates for IPR across different matching methods (Yellow background: Ensemble weighted average across all matching methods).

• 

  Figure 5. Comparison of treatment effect estimates for LOS across different matching methods (Yellow background: Ensemble weighted average across all matching methods).

• 

  Figure 6. Comparison of treatment effect estimates for DIC across different matching methods (Yellow background: Ensemble weighted average across all matching methods).

• 

  Figure 7. Comparison of treatment effect estimates for DIR across different matching methods (Yellow background: Ensemble weighted average across all matching methods).

• 

  Figure 8. Comparison of treatment effect estimates for CER across different matching methods (Yellow background: Ensemble weighted average across all matching methods).

• 

  Figure 9. Comparison of treatment effect estimates for CLE across different matching methods (Yellow background: Ensemble weighted average across all matching methods).

• 

  Figure 10. Distribution patterns of individual treatment effects across six clinical outcomes.

• 

  Figure 11. Sensitivity analysis of treatment effect estimates to unobserved confounding across six clinical outcomes.

• 

  Figure 12. Network analysis of relationships between baseline variables and clinical outcomes.