Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To analyse in the general population the prevalence and predictors of symptomatology consistent with post-traumatic stress disorder (S-PTSD) 18 months after an industrial explosion. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS AND OUTCOME MEASURES: A random sample of 1191 city inhabitants, including an oversample of the immediate area (<3 km). S-PTSD was measured by the self-administered Impact of Event Scale-Revised. The relation between S-PTSD and individual vulnerability factors, immediate exposure and post-trauma factors was analysed by gender. RESULTS: S-PTSD was more prevalent in the immediate area than in the peripheral area (women 19% vs 8%; men 8% vs 2%, p<0.01). In the immediate area, S-PTSD was independently associated with birth outside France (men: OR(a) = 13.9, 95% CI 3.7 to 52.8; women: OR(a) = 2.1, 95% CI 1.0 to 4.2), age more than 40 years (men: OR(a) = 4.3, 95% CI 1.01 to 18.2; women: OR(a) = 2.3, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.5), previous psychotropic treatment (men: OR(a) = 11.5, 95% CI 2.4 to 53.6), proximity to the explosion (less educated men only) (OR(a) = 9.3, 95% CI 1.9 to 44.7), rescue efforts (men: OR(a) = 5.2, 95% CI 1.5 to 18.2), temporarily uninhabitable home (men: OR(a) = 5.8, 95% CI 1.9 to 18.1), personal injury (women: OR(a) = 3.7, 95% CI 1.7 to 8.4), financial difficulties (men: OR(a) = 17.4, 95% CI 4.2 to 72.1; women: OR(a) = 3.4, 95% CI 1.7 to 7.1) and inconvenience due to closure of public services (women: OR(a) = 4.1, 95% CI 1.6 to 9.9). CONCLUSIONS: Individual vulnerability, exposure and post-trauma factors were associated with S-PTSD. Vulnerable subgroups, defined by low socioeconomic characteristics may warrant focused screening after such disasters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rivière et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: