Key result
Computer-assisted multislice computed tomography systematically underestimated absolute coronary lumen volume compared with intravascular ultrasound (177 vs 267 mm3, P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does QMSCT-CA accurately and reproducibly measure coronary plaque compared to IVUS in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=48)
Blinded
Does QMSCT-CA accurately and reproducibly measure coronary plaque compared to IVUS in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease?
QMSCT-CA systematically underestimates absolute coronary lumen and vessel dimensions compared to IVUS, though it demonstrates acceptable inter-investigator reproducibility.
QMSCT-CA underestimation warrants caution for absolute lumen measures; Level 4 data leaves open its accuracy versus IVUS for plaque quantification.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate reproducibility and accuracy of computer-assisted coronary plaque measurements by multislice computed tomography coronary angiography (QMSCT-CA). METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-eight patients undergoing MSCT-CA and coronary arteriography for symptomatic coronary artery disease and quantitative intravascular ultrasound (IVUS, QCU) were examined. Two investigators performed the QMSCT-CA twice and a third investigator performed the QCU, all blinded for each other's results. There was no difference found for the matched region of interest (ROI) lengths (QCU 29.4 +/- 13 mm vs. QMSCT-CA 29.6 +/- 13 mm, P = 0.6; total length = 1,400 mm). The comparison of volumetric measurements showed (lumen QCU 267 +/- 139 mm(3) vs. mean QMSCT-CA 177 +/- 91 mm(3), P < 0.001; vessel 454 +/- 194 mm(3) vs. 398 +/- 187 mm(3), P <<0.001; and plaque 189 +/- 93 mm(3) vs. 222 +/- 121 mm(3); investigator 1, P = 0.02; and investigator 2, P = 0.07) significant differences. Automated lumen detection was also applied for QMSCT-CA (218 +/- 112 mm(3), P < 0.001 vs. QCU). The interinvestigator variability measurements for QMSCT-CA showed no significant differences. CONCLUSION: QMSCT-CA systematically underestimates absolute coronary lumen- and vessel dimensions when compared with QCU. However, repeated measurements of coronary plaque by QMSCT-CA showed no statistically significant differences, although, the outcome showed a scattered result. Automated lumen detection for QMSCT-CA showed improved results when compared with those of human investigators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bruining et al. (2007) conducted a cross-sectional in Symptomatic coronary artery disease (n=48). Computer-assisted multislice computed tomography coronary angiography (QMSCT-CA) vs. Quantitative intravascular ultrasound (QCU) was evaluated on Lumen volume (p=<0.001). Computer-assisted multislice computed tomography systematically underestimated absolute coronary lumen volume compared with intravascular ultrasound (177 vs 267 mm3, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: