OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the augmentation process and ability of autogenous bone graft particles of two different sizes in a vertical augmentation chamber. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The cranial bones of 24 rabbits were used. Two polytetrafluoroethylene chambers were filled with harvested bone from tibia with small bone (SB; 150-400 microm) and large bone (LB; 1.0-2.0 mm) of the same weight. Animals were sacrificed after 1, 2, 4 and 8 weeks. The samples were analyzed by micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) for quantitative analysis, and embedded in polyester resin as non-decalcified specimens for histological analysis. Total bone volume (TBV), bone height (BH) and distribution of bone structure were calculated by micro-CT. RESULTS: Micro-CT evaluation and histology revealed a significant difference between the investigated specimens. TBV and BH of SB decreased to about 50% of the initial situation, and there was a statistically significant difference between 1 and 8 weeks. In contrast, TBV and BH of LB were almost retained at all experimental time points. Significant differences in TBV and BH were also observed between LB and SB at 8 weeks. Bone volume of SB decreased predominantly in the upper half of the chamber at 4 and 8 weeks. In the histological observations, SB showed favorable new bone formation and rapid bone resorption in a time-dependent manner during the entire experimental period. However, LB exhibited favorable morphological stability and continued new bone formation. CONCLUSION: SB follows a smooth osteogenic process, whereas it is not effective in volume augmentation. LB is superior to SB in augmentation ability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kon et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: