This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND: Our study aimed to assess the effects of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) on ventilation/perfusion mismatch, and individual variability in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) by electrical impedance tomography (EIT). METHODS: at 30 min) maintained this dose, while non-responders had their dose doubled every 30 min, up to 40 ppm, until achieving a ≥ 20% improvement. The trial lasted 3 h. EIT data and clinical respiratory and hemodynamic parameters were collected at baseline (0 h), and at 30 min and 3 h after iNO initiation. RESULTS: At 30 min, 36.7% (11/30) of patients responded, associated with younger age and lower prevalence of hypertension. Among responders, the proportion of ventral perfusion significantly increased at 3 h, with this change already observed at 30 min. Responders also showed a significant reduction in the proportion of only perfused units in the dorsal region at 30 min; at the whole-lung level, the proportions of only perfused units and unmatched units decreased. In contrast, non-responders showed an increased proportion of only perfused units in both the dorsal region and whole lung at 3 h compared to baseline, following prolonged high-dose iNO administration. CONCLUSIONS: The response to iNO varied. In responders, EIT showed a potential redistribution of lung perfusion toward ventral regions, with reductions in the proportions of only perfused units and unmatched units in the whole lung.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: