Titania is considered an interesting anode candidate for Li + -ion batteries, as it offers a high theoretical capacity (1280 mAh cm −3 or 336 mAh g −1 ) and long term cycling stability. Unfortunately, the most commonly investigated anatase structure never reaches the theoretical capacity at practical charging rates (i.e. above 1 C). In this work, we compare amorphous (am-TiO 2 ) to anatase TiO 2 thin-films, and investigate the exceptional performance of am-TiO 2 as Li + -ion insertion electrode. An in-depth electrochemical characterization using cyclic voltammetry (CV), constant current lithiation and delithiation, and potentiostatic intermittent titration technique (PITT) is performed. From CV, the insertion and extraction kinetics of am-TiO 2 is found to be unrestricted by diffusion, contrary to anatase. Based on our combined electrochemical results, two different mechanisms are formulated for anatase and am-TiO 2 . Whereas anatase is filled from the "top-down", with a buildup of Li near the electrode/electrolyte interface, am-TiO 2 shows a "bottom-up" filling mechanism. This discrepancy is ascribed to the difference in diffusion coefficient measured for am-TiO 2 and anatase. This work highlights the differences of Li-ion insertion into amorphous TiO 2 compared to anatase, and gives guidance on material development for high capacity and fast charging electrodes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moitzheim et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: