Why the study?
Is the ACE gene polymorphism associated with intracranial saccular aneurysms?
Is the ACE gene polymorphism associated with intracranial saccular aneurysms?
The D/D genotype of the ACE gene is significantly less frequent in patients with intracranial saccular aneurysms, suggesting a potential genetic correlation with the etiology of the disease.
May inform genetic risk models for aneurysms; leaves open whether ACE variants warrant clinical screening.
A polymorphism in the angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) gene has been associated with cerebrovascular diseases as a new potent risk factor. The purpose of this study was to investigate an association of the gene polymorphism with intracranial saccural aneurysmal patients. The study population consisted of 83 aneurysmal patients (age range 41-85 years) (the AN group) and 104 matched control subjects (age range 30-81 years) (the Control group). For detection of the ACE gene polymorphism, the standard PCR method was performed by using genomic DNA isolated from peripheral blood leukocytes. The PCR products were a 490-bp in the presence of the insertion (I) and a 190-bp fragment in the absence of the insertion (D). The ACE gene polymorphism was classified into three genotypes: I/I genotype (a 490-bp band); D/D genotype (a 190-bp band); or I/D genotype (both a 490-bp and a 190-bp band). The number of subjects with I/I, I/D, and D/D genotypes was 38, 40, and 5 in the AN group and 43, 45, and 16 in the Control group, respectively. The frequency of the D/D genotype in the AN group was significantly lower (5/83 = 0.06) than that in the Control group (16/104 = 0.15) (chi 2 = 4.06; p = 0.044). There was no significant difference between the genotype sof hypertensive patients and normotensive patients in the AN group. Thus, this present study suggests that genetic heterogeneity of the ACE gene may be correlated with the etiology of intracranial aneurysms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takenaka et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: