The current study examined the incremental utility of rating scales, a structured diagnostic interview, and multiple informants in a comprehensive assessment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The sample included 185 children with ADHD ( M age = 9.22, SD = 0.95) and 82 children without ADHD ( M age = 9.24, SD = 0.88). Logistic regressions were used to examine the incremental contribution of each method within an assessment of ADHD. Results indicated that information collected from a structured diagnostic interview was unable to significantly improve a prediction model including parent and teacher ratings (Block χ 2 = 0.91, ρ = .64). Teacher ratings on symptom-based scales resulted in significant model improvement beyond parent ratings alone (Block χ 2 = 48.47, ρ < .001). Exploratory analyses indicated that using behavioral rating scales correctly classified all participants by diagnosis. Clinical implications are highlighted, and future research directions are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vaughn et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: