The application scope of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) is severely restricted by their weak chemical stability and limited pore size. A robust MOF with large mesopores is highly desired, yet poses a great synthetic challenge. Herein, two chemically stable Ni(II)-pyrazolate MOFs, BUT-32 and -33, were constructed from a conformation-matched elongated pyrazolate ligand through the isoreticular expansion. The two MOFs share the same sodalite-type net, but have different pore sizes due to the network interpenetration in BUT-32. Controlled syntheses of the two MOFs have been achieved through precisely tuning reaction conditions, where the microporous BUT-32 was demonstrated to be a thermodynamically stable product while the mesoporous BUT-33 is kinetically favored. To date, BUT-32 represents the first example of Ni 4 -pyrazolate MOF whose structure was unambiguously determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Interestingly, the kinetic product BUT-33 integrates 2.6 nm large mesopores with accessible Ni(II) active sites and remarkable chemical stability even in 4 M NaOH aqueous solution and 1 M Grignard reagent. This MOF thus demonstrated an excellent catalytic performance in carbon–carbon coupling reactions, superior to other Ni(II)-MOFs including BUT-32. These findings highlight the importance of kinetic control in the reticular synthesis of mesoporous MOFs, as well as their superiority in heterogeneous catalysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: