Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) controls of the outcome of the immune response to T cell-dependent antigens by dictating whether T cell responsiveness will result (MHC-immune response [Ir]genes) or alternatively T cell nonresponsiveness will occur, possibly through the activation of suppressor cells (MHC-immune suppression [Is] genes). In mice, I-A molecules typically restrict antigen-specific helper T cells. In contrast, H-2 I-E molecules have been reported to control nonresponsiveness to a variety of antigens through antigen-specific suppressor cells. In analogy, HLA-DR molecules are the dominant restriction elements for helper T cells in man. This forces the question whether DQ molecules may be involved in controlling nonresponsiveness in man, e.g. through suppression. In one system, T cell nonresponsiveness to Schistosoma japonicum, evidence has been presented supporting this notion. We have now used a second system, Mycobacterium leprae-specific T cell nonresponsiveness, that is typically found in lepromatous leprosy patients. We find positive but limited evidence for a role for HLA-DQ molecules in controlling T cell nonresponsiveness to M. leprae of the 22 nonresponder patients tested, 4 showed a proliferative T cell response to M. leprae after the addition of DQ- but not DR-specific mAb to the cell cultures. In one of the four BCG nonresponders, anti-DQ mAb had a similar effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ottenhoff et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: