Key result
Motivational interviewing proficiency among health professionals was sustained over 2.6 years with no significant effect of time on proficiency (estimate < 0.001/d; 95% CI, -0.001 to 0.001; P=.913).
Why the study?
Motivational interviewing proficiency may erode quickly, limiting its effectiveness.
Does a moderate amount of training sustain motivational interviewing proficiency in health professionals?
RCT (n=12)
randomly allocated
Does a moderate amount of training sustain motivational interviewing proficiency in health professionals?
Health professionals can sustain proficiency in motivational interviewing over 2.6 years with a moderate amount of initial and ongoing training.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Coaching and reflections sustained MI proficiency in the trial; extends fidelity strategies for behavioral interventions in rehabilitation RCTs.
INTRODUCTION: Motivational interviewing (MI) proficiency may erode quickly, limiting its effectiveness. We examined whether health professionals completing a 2-day workshop, with 3 to 5 hours of personalized coaching, and twice-yearly group reflections sustained proficiency for the duration of a hip fracture rehabilitation trial and whether intervention was implemented as intended. METHODS: A fidelity study was completed as part of a process evaluation of the trial that tested whether physical activity increased among hip fracture patients randomly allocated to receive MI (experimental) compared with dietary advice (control) over ten 30-minute sessions. Twelve health professionals (none were proficient in MI before trial commencement) delivered the intervention for up to 952 days. Two hundred experimental sessions (24% of all sessions, 83 patients) were randomly selected to evaluate proficiency using the MI Treatment Integrity scale; along with 20 control sessions delivered by four dietitians. Linear mixed-effects regression analyses determined whether proficiency was sustained over time. Dose was assessed from all experimental sessions ( n = 840, 98 patients). RESULTS: Intervention was implemented as intended; 82% of patients received at least eight 30-minute sessions. All motivational interviewers were proficient, whereas dietitians did not inadvertently deliver MI. Time had no effect on MI proficiency (est < 0.001/d, P = .913, 95% CI, -0.001 to 0.001). DISCUSSION: MI proficiency was sustained in a large trial over 2.6 years by completing a 2-day workshop, 3 to 5 hours of personalized coaching, and twice-yearly group reflections, even for those without previous experience; further research needs to establish the maximum duration of training effectiveness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rimayanti et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Hip fracture rehabilitation (n=12). Motivational interviewing training vs. Dietary advice was evaluated on Motivational interviewing proficiency over time (est < 0.001/d, 95% CI -0.001 to 0.001, p=.913). Motivational interviewing proficiency among health professionals was sustained over 2.6 years with no significant effect of time on proficiency (estimate < 0.001/d; 95% CI, -0.001 to 0.001; P=.913).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: