Key result
In patients with type 2 diabetes, time in range was significantly associated with the presence of abnormal ankle-brachial index (OR 0.979), independent of HbA1C levels.
Why the study?
Time in range is closely related to diabetic microangiopathy and other complications, but its correlation with lower limb angiopathy had not been studied.
Is time in range (TIR) associated with abnormal ankle-brachial index (ABI) in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Cross-Sectional (n=405)
No
Is time in range (TIR) associated with abnormal ankle-brachial index (ABI) in patients with type 2 diabetes?
In patients with type 2 diabetes, lower time in range (TIR) is independently associated with abnormal ankle-brachial index, suggesting TIR may be a more sensitive marker for lower limb vascular disease risk than HbA1c.
Lower TIR may flag higher PAD risk in T2D; cross-sectional data leave causal effects and practice change open.
BACKGROUND: Time in range (TIR), a novel proxy measure of glucose control, is found closely related to diabetic microangiopathy and some other chronic complications, but the correlation between TIR and lower limb angiopathy has not been studied yet. Our purpose is to explore the relationship between TIR and abnormal ankle-brachial index(ABI) in type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We retrospectively collected patients' information from the database and performed cross-sectional analysis. A total of 405 type 2 diabetes patients were enrolled in this study. ABI was measured and patients were stratified into low, normal, and high groups according to ≤ 0.9, > 0.9 and < 1.3, ≥ 1.3 ABI values. All patients underwent continuous glucose monitoring(CGM), and TIR was defined as the percentage of time in which glucose was in the range of 3.9-10 mmol/L during a 24-h period. Correlations between TIR and abnormal ABI were analyzed using Spearman analysis. And logistic regression was used to explore whether TIR is an independent risk factor for abnormal ABI. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of abnormal ABI was 20.2% (low 4.9% and high 15.3%). TIR was lower in patients with abnormal ABI values (P = 0.009). The prevalence of abnormal ABI decreased with increasing quartiles of TIR (P = 0.026). Abnormal ABI was negatively correlated with TIR and positively correlated with hypertension, age, diabetes duration, UREA, Scr, ACR, TAR, MBG, and M values (P < 0.05). The logistic regression revealed a significant association between TIR and abnormal ABI, while HbA1C and blood glucose variability measures had no explicit correlation with abnormal ABI. Additionally, there was a significant difference in LDL between the low and high ABI groups (P = 0.009), and in Scr between normal and low groups (P = 0.007). And there were significant differences in TIR (P = 0.003), age (P = 0.023), UREA (P = 0.006), ACR (P = 0.004), TAR (P = 0.015), and MBG (P = 0.014) between normal and high ABI groups, and in diabetes duration between both normal and low (P = 0.023) and normal and high (P = 0.006) groups. CONCLUSIONS: In type 2 diabetes patients, abnormal ABI is associated with lower TIR, and the correlation is stronger than that with HbA1C. Therefore, the role of TIR should be emphasized in the evaluation of lower limb vascular diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 2 diabetes (n=405). Time in range (TIR) vs. Lower time in range was evaluated on Abnormal ankle-brachial index (ABI ≤ 0.9 or ≥ 1.3) (OR 0.979, 95% CI 0.967-0.990, p=<0.001). In patients with type 2 diabetes, time in range was significantly associated with the presence of abnormal ankle-brachial index (OR 0.979), independent of HbA1C levels.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: