In this paper, a back-analysis method of deep excavation based on the Pareto multiobjective optimization is proposed and a multiobjective optimization algorithm multialgorithm genetically adaptive multiobjective method (AMALGAM) is implemented in a commercial FEM software to identify soil parameters based on multiple types of field observations. The proposed method is applied to a well-instrumented deep excavation, i.e., the Taipei National Enterprise Center (TNEC) project. The observed wall deflection and ground surface settlement at Stage 3 of the excavation are simultaneously used to estimate the nine soil parameters of the modified Cam-clay (MCC) model for three clay layers. The Pareto front in the biobjective space exhibits a rectangular shape, which implies that the simultaneous minimization of both objectives can be achieved. The back-analyzed soil parameters of the compromise solution from the biobjective back-analysis can reasonably simulate both the wall deflection and ground surface settlement for Stage 3. The differences of the predictions and the actual observations for Stages 4 to 7 using the back-analyzed soil parameters from Stage 3 are mainly because the inadequacy of the MCC model to simulate the small strain soil behaviors of excavation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: