A model is presented for calculating the distributions of velocity and boundary shear stress across irregular straight open channels. A turbulent kinetic energy transport equation and a two‐dimensional ramp function for the turbulent length scale provide turbulence closure. A modified sigma transformation maps the channel cross section onto a rectangular domain; the transformed equations are solved by a simple finite difference algorithm. Velocity profiles generated by the model are logarithmic close to the bed, but in the core of the flow, predicted velocities follow a wake profile similar to that observed experimentally. The boundary shear stresses calculated by the model for smooth one‐dimensional flows are accurate to within 0.02%. The model also reproduces flow and boundary shear stress data for smooth rectangular and trapezoidal laboratory channels; the average boundary shear stress is calculated to within about 1%, and the distributions of velocity and shear stress are similar to those obtained from laboratory measurements. Local errors are caused by ignoring weak secondary currents and by using a simplistic symmetry assumption for the boundary condition at the water's surface. The model overestimates the discharge by an average of 8%; this error probably occurs because the model ignores the resistance due to secondary currents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. E. Pizzuto (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: