BACKGROUND: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas account for approximately 5% of pancreatic neoplasms. Prognosis is superior to that of pancreatic invasive ductal carcinoma. IPMNs reveal a variety of epithelial linings expressing different mucin staining patterns and may progress along different oncogenic pathways. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-two IPMNs were studied for expression of MUC1, MUC2, p16, p21, HER2, cyclin D1, and p53 protein and for mutations in K-ras, HER2, p53, EGFR, and BRAF genes. The cases were evaluated for dysplasia, presence of invasion, and morphology of lining epithelium. RESULTS: Twenty-six IPMNs appeared intestinal (IN). Five were low, 12 moderate, and 9 high grade. K-ras mutations were found in 15, EGFR mutations in 2, and BRAF mutation in 1. Seven cases were pancreaticobiliary (PB) and all showed moderate to high-grade dysplasia. Six K-ras mutations and 2 p53 mutations were found in PB tumors. p53 mutations were in cases with high-grade dysplasia. Nineteen IPMNs demonstrated a gastric foveolar (GF) pattern. The majority of GF cases had low or moderate dysplasia. Sixteen revealed K-ras mutations and 1 case each demonstrated a HER2 or p53 mutation. Five IPMNs revealed invasive adenocarcinoma, including a colloid carcinoma from an IN type epithelium. CONCLUSIONS: IN pattern IPMNs were the most common. Mixed histology was common. K-ras mutations were most common, but did not correlate with dysplasia. p53 mutations were seen in 6% of cases (only in GF and PB subtypes). A HER2 mutation was found in a GF IPMN. EGFR and BRAF mutations were restricted to IN IPMNs. These findings suggest the possibility of alternate pathways for carcinogenesis between epithelial subtypes of IPMNs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chadwick et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: