Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
If members of a suite of sensors from which fusion is to be carried out are not colocated, it is unreasonable to assume that they share a common resolution cell grid; this is generally ignored in the data fusion community. We explore the effects of such "noncoincidence", and we find that what at first seems to be a problem can in fact be exploited. The idea is that a target is known to be confined to an intersection of overlapping resolution cells, and this overlap is generally small. We examine noncoincidence from two viewpoints: tracking and detection. With respect to tracking our analysis is first static, by which is meant that we establish the decrease in measurement error; and then dynamic, meaning that the overall effect in the tracking problem is quantified. The detection viewpoint considers noncoincidence as it has impact on a predetection fusion system. Specifically, the role of the fusion rule is examined, and the use of noncoincidence to improve detection performance (rather than that of tracking) is explored.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rago et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: