Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze how differences in strategic integration between women and men in HR director positions vary in an international comparison and particularly how gender‐egalitarian cultural values influence the level of these differences. Design/methodology/approach Cross‐country comparison of HR managers involving 22 countries based on the 2004 Cranet survey. Findings Consistent with the hypothesis, findings show a negative relationship between gender‐egalitarian values and sex differences in strategic integration. Practical implications Enhanced understanding of impact of cultural egalitarianism on cross‐national differences in segregation of women in the HR profession. Originality/value Level of segregation of women in HR director positions varies with the prevalence of gender‐egalitarian cultural values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brandl et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: