Dr Riis provides a cool Nordic analysis of scientific dishonesty and concludes that there is a need for a national independent control body that should take initiatives for strong preventative action.1 I disagree. There is no real evidence that scientific dishonesty is on the increase. Even if it were, it does not matter. Unsound data are already published for a variety of reasons, the chief of which are unsound methodologies and …
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
I. Cavill (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: