Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A tridentate Schiff base carboxylate ligand, derived from the condensation of pyridine 2-carboxaldehyde with anthranilic acid, reacts with copper trifluoroacetate salt to give rise to the helical chain complex [Cu(C(13)H(9)N(2)O(2))(F(3)CCO(2))](n)() (1) and with copper nitrate to give rise to the tetranuclear complex [[Cu(4)(C(13)H(9)N(2)O(2))(4)(H(2)O)(4)].3.5NO(3).0.5N(3)] (2) with the addition of azide salt. The structures of these complexes have been solved by X-ray crystallography. The Cu(II) ions are in a distorted square-pyramidal environment in complex 1. They are sequentially bridged by carboxylate groups in the syn-anti conformation, resulting in the formation of an infinite helix like chain along the crystallographic c-axis. The crystal structure of complex 2 consists of tetranuclear [Cu(4)(L)(4)(H(2)O)(4)](4+) (L = C(13)H(9)N(2)O(2)(-)) cations and isolated NO(3)(-) and N(3)(-) anions in the ratio 1:3.5:0.5, respectively, involving bridging carboxylate groups in the syn-anti conformation. For 1 the carboxylato-Cu(II) coordination is apical-basal, while for 2 it is basal-basal. From the magnetic susceptibility measurements the complex 1 is found to exhibit very weak antiferromagnetic interaction whereas a weak ferromagnetic coupling has been established for complex 2. The magnetic behavior can be satisfactorily explained on the basis of the structural data for these and related complexes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dey et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: