Key result
Autologous bone marrow cell therapy after acute STEMI showed no consistently better outcome compared to placebo at 6 months, with inferior changes in infarct size (0.4 g vs -5.1 g, p=0.047).
Why the study?
Does autologous bone marrow cell therapy improve myocardial innervation, perfusion, metabolism, and infarct size in patients with acute STEMI after successful thrombolysis and PCI?
RCT (n=19)
Double-blind
Randomized
Yes
Does autologous bone marrow cell therapy improve myocardial innervation, perfusion, metabolism, and infarct size in patients with acute STEMI after successful thrombolysis and PCI?
Autologous bone marrow cell therapy did not consistently improve myocardial recovery and was inferior to placebo regarding rest perfusion and infarct size reduction at 6 months post-STEMI.
Does not support autologous bone marrow cell therapy after STEMI; challenges earlier signals of benefit and closes this therapeutic avenue.
PURPOSE: Beneficial mechanisms of bone marrow cell (BMC) therapy for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarct (STEMI) are largely unknown in humans. Therefore, we evaluated the feasibility of serial positron emission tomography (PET) and MRI studies to provide insight into the effects of BMCs on the healing process of ischemic myocardial damage. METHODS: Nineteen patients with successful primary reteplase thrombolysis (mean 2.4 h after symptoms) for STEMI were randomized for BMC therapy (2.9 × 10(6) CD34+ cells) or placebo after bone marrow aspiration in a double-blind, multi-center study. Three days post-MI, coronary angioplasty, and paclitaxel eluting stent implantation preceded either BMC or placebo therapy. Cardiac PET and MRI studies were performed 7-12 days after therapies and repeated after 6 months, and images were analyzed at a central core laboratory. RESULTS: In BMC-treated patients, there was a decrease in [(11)C]-HED defect size (-4.9 ± 4.0 vs. -1.6 ± 2.2%, p = 0.08) and an increase in [(18)F]-FDG uptake in the infarct area at risk (0.06 ± 0.09 vs. -0.05 ± 0.16, p = 0.07) compared to controls, as well as less left ventricular dilatation (-4.4 ± 13.3 vs. 8.0 ± 16.7 mL/m(2), p = 0.12) at 6 months follow-up. However, BMC treatment was inferior to placebo in terms of changes in rest perfusion in the area at risk (-0.09 ± 0.17 vs. 0.10 ± 0.17, p = 0.03) and infarct size (0.4 ± 4.2 vs. -5.1 ± 5.9 g, p = 0.047), and no effect was observed on ejection fraction (p = 0.37). CONCLUSION: After the acute phase of STEMI, BMC therapy showed only minor trends of long-term benefit in patients with rapid successful thrombolysis. There was a trend of more decrease in innervation defect size and enhanced glucose metabolism in the infarct-related myocardium and also a trend of less ventricular dilatation in the BMC-treated group compared to placebo. However, no consistently better outcome was observed in the BMC-treated group compared to placebo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mäki et al. (2012) conducted an RCT in Acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=19). Autologous bone marrow cell (BMC) therapy vs. Placebo (patient's own serum and heparinized saline) was evaluated on Change in infarct size (g) at 6 months (p=0.047). Autologous bone marrow cell therapy after acute STEMI showed no consistently better outcome compared to placebo at 6 months, with inferior changes in infarct size (0.4 g vs -5.1 g, p=0.047).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: