This expert consensus document updates the 2001 standards for cardiac catheterization laboratories, addressing the expansion of facilities without onsite surgical backup and emphasizing the necessity of robust QA/QI programs.
Standardizes cath lab QA, volume, and operations without surgical backup; extends 2001 consensus to current practice.
Appendix 1. Author Relationships With Industry and Other Entities (Relevant(—2012 ACCF/SCAI Expert Consensus Document on Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Standards Update This document has been developed as an expert consensus document by the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI), in collaboration with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) and Society for Vascular Medicine (SVM). Expert consensus documents are intended to inform practitioners, payers, and other interested parties of the opinion of ACCF and document cosponsors concerning evolving areas of clinical practice and/or technologies that are widely available or new to the practice community. Topics chosen for coverage by this ECD are so designed because the evidence base, the experience with technology, and/or clinical practice are not considered sufficiently well developed to be evaluated by the formal ACCF/American Heart Association (AHA) Practice Guidelines process. Often the topic is the subject of considerable ongoing investigation. Thus, the reader should view the ECD as the best attempt of the ACCF and document cosponsors to inform and guide clinical practice in areas where rigorous evidence may not yet be available or evidence to date is not widely applied to clinical practice. When feasible, ECDs include indications or contraindications. Some topics covered by ECDs will be addressed subsequently by the ACCF/AHA Practice Guidelines Committee. The ACCF Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (TF CECD) makes every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that might arise as a result of an outside relationship or personal interest of a member of the writing panel. Specifically, all members of the writing panel are asked to provide disclosure statements of all such relationships that might be perceived as relevant to the writing effort. This information is documented in a table, reviewed by the parent task force before final writing committee selections are made, reviewed by the writing committee in conjunction with each conference call and/or meeting of the group, updated as changes occur throughout the document development process, and ultimately published as an appendix to the document. External peer reviewers of the document are asked to provide this information as well. The disclosure tables for writing committee members and peer reviewers are listed in Appendices 1 and 2, respectively, of this document. Additionally, in the spirit of complete transparency, writing committee members' comprehensive disclosure information—including relationships with industry and other entities that do not pertain to this document—is available online. Disclosure information for members of the ACCF TF CECD—as the oversight group for this document development process—is also available online. The work of the writing committee was supported exclusively by the ACCF without commercial support. Writing committee members volunteered their time to this effort. Meetings and/or conference calls of the writing committee were confidential and attended only by committee members. The last expert consensus document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards was published in 2001 (1). Since then, many changes have occurred as the setting has evolved from being primarily diagnostic based into a therapeutic environment. Technology has changed both the imaging and reporting systems. The lower risk of invasive procedures has seen the expansion of cardiac catheterization laboratories to sites without onsite cardiovascular surgery backup and even to community hospitals where primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is now being performed. This has increased the importance of quality assurance (QA) and quality improvement (QI) initiatives. At the same time, the laboratory has become a multipurpose suite with both diagnostic procedures to investigate pulmonary hypertension and coronary flow and with therapeutic procedures that now include intervention into the cerebral and peripheral vascular systems as well as in structural heart disease. These new procedures have impacted both the adult and pediatric catheterization laboratories. The approaches now available allow for the treatment of even very complex heart disease and have led to the development of hybrid cardiac catheterization laboratories where a team of physicians (including invasive cardiologists, cardiovascular surgeons, noninvasive cardiologists, and anesthesiologists) is required. Despite a growth in procedural sites and in procedural capabilities in the cardiac catheterization laboratory, the total number of coronary interventional procedures has steadily declined over the last few years. Full-service hospitals should provide, not only cardiovascular surgery, but also cardiovascular anesthesia and consulting services in vascular, nephrology, neurology, and hematology. Advanced imaging and mechanical support services should also be available. Not every hospital with onsite cardiovascular surgery should be offering all services unless the expertise is available to evaluate, treat, and handle any potential complications that occur. Patients requiring highly specialized procedures or pediatric procedures should have studies only in facilities with the medical expertise and equipment to perform these procedures at the highest level. Despite prior guidelines that suggest limitations to the expansion of cardiac catheterization without onsite surgical backup, the number of these sites has increased dramatically over the last decade. The Certificate of Need (CON) regulatory programs have had little impact on this expansion. Whether quality and outcomes are similar to hospitals with onsite cardiovascular surgery remains uncertain. The actual number of laboratories without surgical backup is difficult to confirm, but most estimates suggest it is around 25% to 35% of all laboratories in the United States. Because of fixed costs to maintain these facilities, costs and charges per patient at these sites may actually be higher than in facilities with onsite surgery. The remarkably low risk now associated with diagnostic cardiac catheterization suggests that only a few cardiovascular patients cannot safely undergo procedures in these laboratories. The 2001 ACC/SCAI consensus document suggests limiting diagnostic procedures in laboratories without cardiovascular surgical backup to the very lowest-risk patients; the current document lifts almost all these restrictions. Limitations related to age, congestive heart failure (CHF) status, the severity in stress test abnormalities, left ventricular (LV) function, and the presence of valve disease have all been removed. It is still recommended that patients with pulmonary edema due to ischemia, patients with complex congenital heart disease, and pediatric patients still be treated only in full-service facilities. Certain therapeutic procedures should still be done only in facilities with cardiovascular surgical backup. These include therapeutic procedures in adult congenital heart disease and pediatrics. It is generally believed that elective and primary PCI are permissible in sites without cardiovascular surgery, if there is strict adherence to national guidelines. In particular, there must be a documented working relationship with a larger facility with cardiovascular surgical services and an emergency transportation system operative. The document outlines the current guidelines where this is acceptable. The committee also believes that it is the responsibility of any facility performing coronary intervention without cardiovascular surgical backup to document that all national risk stratification and medication guidelines are being followed. In addition, a QA/QI system must be operative and active, and, if an ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) program is in place, the laboratory should be operational 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Any national volume guidelines must also be strictly followed. The modern cardiac catheterization laboratory is a complex, highly sophisticated medical and radiological facility where patients with both chronic-stable and life-threatening illnesses are evaluated. With the expansion of laboratories and the increase in the complexity of procedures, it is to have an QA/QI system in of the laboratory The committee all laboratories to in national such as the Cardiovascular to are and available in a to allow for In this all laboratories their and The of or coronary disease at cardiac catheterization in any 1 laboratory on the of patients but the is from to related to the catheterization are very low and should be for diagnostic procedures and for elective The risk is higher in the setting of an myocardial infarction but even in that the should be must be considered and a for and At of PCI procedures are done on a diagnostic there is evidence this practice has an on procedures should be the patient from a for or an interventional at a time the risk of In the disease is only the should undergo emergency to outcomes in peripheral vascular and intervention are The to as do the to coronary disease have had to and to provide for this are and are not for coronary This is by the that vascular and interventional may also be so as well as may the Because yet in an ongoing national for these procedures is are to equipment but are due to operational These to include laboratory of a or of and a than a QA/QI program must be considered an of the cardiac catheterization It should be to the but not be of the other hospital It must be and The must include a committee with a and a and a of should be to and should be in The committee should also be to for the and practice standards and guidelines into the laboratory Some should be that procedural clinical and procedural These to be in a and Often a of outcomes physicians in the laboratory is in of a QA/QI process, the current document outlines the a and outlines the that should be in a cardiac catheterization should include patient and include such as medical procedural and include such as quality of procedures, and such as emergency time, and should on medication and procedural and new include such as of and of and of In to the there should be These include outcomes and and do this a from the facility to that a QA/QI program is in and the program committee is and as a for quality that a procedural volume to a and that are In there is to in the and the relationship procedural volume and remains This to the laboratory facility as well as the The of is being addressed by a to the Clinical on Cardiac This document outlines the available the final the of the writing an oversight QA/QI is than on complications should be reviewed by the committee at every and any with for should have the addressed by the and with of all should be reviewed at should be to cardiac catheterization and a of hours per may in The very low for diagnostic catheterization makes for a volume The prior catheterization standards document per as a but that committee this was and had to support the (1). This committee that there is volume for diagnostic catheterization that be supported and to the to the procedures are of the highest The interventional procedural volume of per has become an and have addressed this in relationships and/or and outcomes have been in many have to these the relationship volume and outcomes is complex, and many are in laboratories to the is the that many interventional do not perform procedures each Some perform PCI primarily and are at the or the of and are or a practice. Some perform procedures at facilities, and the for such are The for primary PCI are difficult to because of the low being performed. This committee believes that it is for all primary to be evaluated by the of to in primary PCI should be to these The guidelines for the of both elective and primary PCI in a facility without cardiovascular surgical backup are also studies and of available both suggest these procedures be done safely restrictions. The volume in this setting will be of the Writing to Update the Clinical on Cardiac Because these patients are at highest risk for national guidelines for the in the setting of an must be strictly followed. The facility must have a and documented systems for the of patients to a facility with cardiovascular surgical that all medication and guidelines are being and The of and for in interventional procedures has been by the ACCF Cardiology These are still the for 2, and These are in this but the committee that even there is a from and a The formal to in peripheral vascular intervention is for and with that of interventional and vascular little actually in structural heart disease intervention is an where volume should not evidence for by a of most of these procedures a and should not be by It is recommended that both the and practice associated with structural heart disease intervention be a number of laboratories and with a interest in these Often a working relationship adult and pediatric the environment. number of procedural are of from such as or is laboratory should have a for increased for highly The should include and and are also should include a of to be reviewed the patient at the should include and the potential for PCI should the potential for emergency surgery. should be a of each and should include the the the the of the the for any equipment or and any clinical (including such as the the is to be the test should be The committee reviewed the laboratory in for cardiac catheterization and a in practice The were laboratory should include the and to of the These should be if there has been a clinical or medication that or unless there is disease, a of or the ongoing of a is not prior to the for a by is not in the best interest of the should be than hours or hours a should be considered an prior to and of should have a or test of the is little risk the of In addition, the committee to suggest a in patients with patients on the is days prior to the of for or for is is Patients on or not have the before should be 24 hours prior if the is and hours before if the is to patients with disease there is a risk of the The patients are with and It is recommended that patients with have such as on the of the and that with or at to for to hours prior and to hours should be as well. should be and or should be of has been as a for to should be in is Patients with a or prior should be considered for with and/or and are not considered for patients have the by the prior and the of the patients should have procedures in the if to avoid should be of the and not there is that the has to of the treatment of to is should not be with to new the for has increased over the last few years. the may and is the has vascular complications than the In addition, it for and is in the the and have not changed over the last decade. for the equipment the actual of coronary has changed little over the last decade. with capabilities are coronary may total in patient with and is in structural heart are in most laboratories being in disease as have most on the of the The cardiac catheterization provide information ventricular cardiac vascular and The before and pulmonary are also to the on for patients with pulmonary or stress in patients with information on the best therapeutic in these catheterization has had with the of such procedures as and into the left percutaneous therapeutic for pulmonary and, for with are in heart disease and in heart the hybrid laboratory for percutaneous valve an and imaging have their in a number of percutaneous or and In addition, there are now therapeutic to cardiac of an or the of to a or that have a the The percutaneous of now be in the cardiac catheterization laboratory as well. The of in vascular severity and has led to the development of a of imaging and other that provide imaging with and many are still all risk of that should be In of where vascular is being if has been the the time should to before are and practice is to the patient to for 1 to hours or and to hours to is The patients should have the prior to a most be with and percutaneous risk for PCI has been developed from the It an to at highest risk for a vascular The of vascular has evidence their not vascular these a with of and vascular be done before their The of any vascular is considered a of has changed in the of and the should be with such as or be and with prior to may their cardiac catheterization is and ischemia, as well as a is the most is to to the laboratory for and of the has changed over the last in to cardiac catheterization a of to allow and of the should be The should be for ongoing in the cardiac catheterization include the or in the and laboratory is a for all laboratories and should be an and if not with the procedures and equipment being in the In or new a may be practice. the not have PCI procedures or should be reviewed by the that number is and The laboratory may or may not be the interventional or should work with the The is for and and their The should be the for or should with hospital to and with all and as well. Cardiovascular may perform all of the as their but cannot be primary and must the of the and are primarily for the and and but in the primary in the actual The number and of but a is to and to patient is and that the is and The committee there is formal for this and a such a on a national level. With the from to and it is to have to support. Because of the increased importance of patient and laboratories should have to medical and is meeting the regulatory members of the cardiac catheterization team must have in and the committee in cardiac support as well. The hybrid cardiac catheterization is an procedural suite that the and equipment available in a cardiac catheterization laboratory with anesthesia and surgical facilities and the of an It must all of the of both an and a cardiac catheterization for a hybrid include that surgical percutaneous valve or and percutaneous ventricular where to an surgical may be or to percutaneous valve vascular in valve and percutaneous ventricular hybrid PCI or other vascular with surgical approaches and or and emergency procedures such as or The must be with both the surgical suite and the cardiac catheterization laboratory environment. This is generally done by a team to allow for the the is a catheterization laboratory, on is also a The laboratory be in to the or to the catheterization It must be on a or where and are required. are a with a with These are larger than the cardiac catheterization laboratory and equipment are of is for and for surgical The of the is so as not to with or the The also from the laboratory as a and yet it must be with the of In the hybrid laboratory considerable and a of the is to be before an to the procedures in the catheterization a working relationship with a of to be a and of is the of this document. The primary is to the patient and to of or have increased dramatically with from and the for an of of this is and with little impact on the primary The has many physicians to with larger systems where there may be a increase in the for increased in the of With the in the system and the the must patient to a few of the are addressed in this include the of the of and procedures as are and not in the Guidelines for in many areas are now to led to the of the in and these are designed to procedures being done to to and complex, but a and of the the the and the is a of patient hospitals have a to inform the patient of the of all Cardiology has been the in and clinical patients strict adherence to guidelines and the being The for or should patient and and industry must work to medical and avoid should not industry of interest are designed to any potential and are in to both the and the changes in the equipment have occurred over the last decade. The from to a has been and the from the to the is in and and have a to the formal in are but this is in This an of are and the of each of the of The changes over the last include changes in the and The is a of the total and is from an on the of the It not the of to The of the interventional is recommended to the of the patient The risk from is due to to the by or in to These of are as to the in or and a be at the of this with the it is not The the risk and is to provide a of It is the of the estimates of to each The and are the most in this The with the The at the of the the of the is by the in the of the patient and that is where the on the is It an of the guidelines for patient and to and are in the document and current on and The now as a the of a on the the recommended the best of must also a at the for medical is per and a of of and for the of to to both the patient and to the patient be by the imaging time, of of of and limiting of and other at the of the the to the and that the the the same it is to time, and The impact of in to the is if cardiac catheterization laboratories are to provide also provide of these should be in the patient and of the QA/QI process. are specialized hospitals in the United and all have cardiac catheterization facilities. facilities that perform cardiac catheterization on patients must have the of cardiovascular surgery. laboratories may be facilities or with an adult in are on structural heart and are done than in adult laboratories. Because of the in patient most are to Often the or to in noninvasive of all pediatric are therapeutic and not number of procedures are in congenital heart disease as and are not to procedures that might also be in adult congenital patients include and in pulmonary and vascular of a ventricular pulmonary or valve and a of procedures are where may be of the left heart patient with the pediatric should have a for all of the laboratory similar to the adult physicians should be in and at in pediatric may be where a be but this should not be practice. The pediatric is from to years. It is recommended that in patients this be done by a pediatric congenital heart disease patients may have procedures by a pediatric or with an adult and pediatric The only is the adult with a interest and expertise in adult congenital heart disease. from the adult laboratory and are higher due to the for many of the disease and the at the In 1 in the pediatric laboratory were to be with related to diagnostic catheterization and related to interventional occurred in The of pediatric to the the and should provide ongoing of these is by the in the adult laboratory still most an the is This is the with where it is difficult for to still the Any may be in Often have and medical to a may not Despite the the pediatric are similar to in to laboratory should a on might be to be the to the adult the of the patient and the low volume of procedures The American of Guidelines suggests the of than or laboratory as a guide to The committee suggests a volume of per and a laboratory volume of per a QA/QI program in pediatric laboratories is of should be cardiac catheterization The same for an adult QA/QI program to the pediatric laboratory The for laboratory in the pediatric catheterization patients do not have disease and are not on any is laboratory before the and is almost to perform the Vascular is also on the patient is a or or is of adult procedures are the and procedures are procedures are generally the also be the and In very or the may a is the vascular are not in invasive percutaneous are being the potential for should be to in to capabilities should be procedures be done with systems and left heart and are procedures and equipment to the The on the heart and per is to all the to the heart must be at a higher over 1 to is in the of to an pediatric catheterization laboratory to the highest standards with an adult The same in this group as with are than to the from and that the risk of a or should be of the in a patient must be all of the to should be and the and should be from still The cardiac catheterization laboratory has changes in the last decade. It is a sophisticated where a in from a diagnostic laboratory to a therapeutic is the risk of both diagnostic and interventional procedures has there has been in the of patients may safely have procedures in both and in laboratories without cardiovascular surgical backup. The of peripheral vascular and structural heart intervention has also a in for many laboratories and has to the hybrid cardiac catheterization The in percutaneous for structural heart disease are now to impact both the adult and pediatric catheterization Some of the in many laboratories are being the committee suggests a be before a unless an is should be with as is is recommended to is a of this and importance is as it to volume for both the and the The importance of national to provide is has also into the as patients and have the of medical the of the of should be a of the cardiac catheterization The cardiac catheterization laboratory and will to and over the as and treatment The cardiac catheterization laboratory of from that of a It is that the cardiac catheterization laboratory from now will undergo a similar
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bashore et al. (2012) conducted a review in Cardiac catheterization. Cardiac catheterization laboratory standards was evaluated. The 2012 ACCF/SCAI expert consensus document provides updated standards for cardiac catheterization laboratories, addressing quality assurance, procedural volume, and sites without surgical backup.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: