Empodisma minus and Sporadanthus ferrugineus (both Restionaceae) coexist in New Zealand raised bogs, yet Sporadanthus have significantly more depleted 15 N natural abundance signatures than coexisting Empodisma . Their root systems are spatially separated with Empodisma having a thick surface layer of about 50 mm of cluster roots overlying the deeper Sporadanthus roots. We hypothesized this root displacement allows Empodisma to preferentially access the primary N input from rainfall, thus establishing niche separation, and tested this using tracer stable isotopes. We aerially applied 1.6 mmol m −2 of 15 N as (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 chased by deionized water to simulate a rainfall event of 34 L m −2 . Root/peat matrix cores were harvested after 5 h and analysed for 15 N uptake. Approximately 80% of the tracer applied was recovered in the cores, with 90% of this recovered in the upper Empodisma cluster root layer. Seven weeks after application, young shoots of Empodisma were significantly enriched (mean δ 15 N = +7.21‰; reference = −0.42‰), whereas those of coexisting Sporadanthus were not (mean δ 15 N = −2.76‰; reference = −4.24‰). However, we were unable to quantify the 15 N uptake because of the dilution effect of the large biomass. We calculated the contribution of biological nitrogen fixation as a possible alternative source of N in achieving niche separation. The acetylene reduction assay showed minor amounts of nitrogenase activity are associated with Empodisma and Sporadanthus roots (equivalent to 0.045 ± 0.019 and 0.104 ± 0.017 kg N ha −1 year −1 respectively). Our results suggest that the species acquire nutrients from different rooting zones, with Empodisma accessing nutrients at the surface from rainfall and Sporadanthus accessing nutrients from mineralization in deeper peat layers. Such niche differentiation probably facilitates species coexistence and may provide a mechanism for slowing the rate of competitive displacement during long‐term succession.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clarkson et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: