Key result
The lipid accumulation product (LAP) index demonstrated the highest accuracy in detecting insulin resistance compared to other surrogate indexes, with an area under the curve of 0.728.
Why the study?
Insulin resistance plays a crucial role in type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, but how routine surrogate indexes compare against gold-standard clamp-assessed insulin sensitivity and subclinical vascular damage was evaluated.
Do surrogate indexes of insulin resistance (TG/HDL-C, VAI, LAP, TyG) accurately reflect insulin sensitivity and subclinical vascular damage compared to euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp in subjects with varying glucose tolerance?
Cross-Sectional (n=631)
Yes
Do surrogate indexes of insulin resistance (TG/HDL-C, VAI, LAP, TyG) accurately reflect insulin sensitivity and subclinical vascular damage compared to euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp in subjects with varying glucose tolerance?
The lipid accumulation product (LAP) index is the most accurate surrogate marker among those tested for detecting insulin resistance and increased vascular stiffness.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LAP may aid insulin resistance screening in glucose-intolerant patients; cross-sectional data leaves open prospective validation against clamp measures.
Introduction: Insulin resistance plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (TG/HDL-C) ratio, visceral adiposity index (VAI), lipid accumulation product (LAP) and triglycerides × fasting glucose (TyG) index are surrogate measures of insulin sensitivity based on anthropometric and/or biochemical parameters routinely collected in clinical practice. Herein, we compared the relationships of these four surrogate indexes with insulin sensitivity assessed by the gold standard euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp technique, and subclinical vascular damage. Research design and methods: 631 subjects with different degrees of glucose tolerance underwent euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp. The surrogate TG/HDL-C ratio, VAI, LAP and TyG indexes were computed. Pulse pressure and carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) were measured as indicators of subclinical vascular damage. Results: All the four surrogate indexes showed a significant correlation with insulin-stimulated glucose disposal in the whole study population. However, only LAP index had a significant association with insulin sensitivity across the different glucose tolerance groups. LAP index showed the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.728) to detect individuals with insulin resistance defined as the bottom quartile of insulin-stimulated glucose disposal, followed by TG/HDL-C ratio (0.693), TyG index (0.688) and VAI (0.688). A significant association was found between the four indexes of insulin sensitivity and pulse pressure and IMT. All the four indexes have a similar ability to detect individuals with vascular atherosclerosis defined by IMT>0.9 mm. Conversely, LAP index had the greatest ability to recognize individuals with increased vascular stiffness defined by pulse pressure ≥60 mm Hg. Conclusion: Among the surrogate TG/HDL-C ratio, VAI, LAP and TyG indexes of insulin sensitivity, LAP index showed a significant association with insulin-stimulated glucose disposal across the different glucose tolerance categories and the highest ability to detect insulin resistance and subclinical vascular damage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fiorentino et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Varying degrees of glucose tolerance (n=631). Lipid accumulation product (LAP) index vs. TG/HDL-C ratio, VAI, and TyG indexes was evaluated on Detection of insulin resistance (bottom quartile of insulin-stimulated glucose disposal) (AUC 0.728, 95% CI 0.692 to 0.762). The lipid accumulation product (LAP) index demonstrated the highest accuracy in detecting insulin resistance compared to other surrogate indexes, with an area under the curve of 0.728.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: