Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine the identification rate of substandard and falsified medications and its association with knowledge among public. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in different geographic areas among a convenient sample of people aged 18 or older. A validated web-based electronic questionnaire was used for data collection tool. The questionnaire contained three sections assessing the following: (1) Sociodemographic data; (2) Knowledge regarding counterfeit medicines; and (3) Ability to identify counterfeit medicines, according to 12 questions rated on a five-point Likert scale. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between sociodemographic factors and counterfeit medication identification rate. Results: A total of 320 people participated in the study. Only 98 participants (30.6%, 95% CI 25.6–35.7%) identified the counterfeit medications. Ability to correctly identify counterfeit medications was significantly higher in participants who were older ( p = 0.016), single ( p = 0.001), Asian ( p = 0.001), or American ( p = 0.019), as well as those who indicated that they would check the certification of the medications ( p = 0.015) and report counterfeit medications to the authorities ( p < 0.0001). Conclusions: These results underscore the need for greater public awareness of the hazards associated with counterfeit medicines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
El‐Dahiyat et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: