Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rationale: The clinical impact of a novel mechanical thrombectomy strategy, which integrates distal access with flow reversal and flow arrest via a distal balloon, all within a single procedure [Safety and Efficacy of the overall throMbectomy system for sTroke (SEMTiC) strategy], has not been tested. Aim: study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the combined thrombectomy system-iNedit, iNdeep, and iNtercept-in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Sample size estimates: The study was designed with a sequential structure based on the efficacy endpoint (eTICI ≥2b) reported in the literature [71.1% with a 95% confidence interval of (68.5%, 73.8%)]. An interim analysis was set for 115 patients and a final analysis for 225 patients, ensuring 98% power at a one-sided 0.025 significance level, with a 2.6% non-inferiority margin and a 15% assumed withdrawal rate. Design: SEMTiC-01 is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, open-label clinical safety and efficacy investigation. Outcome: Primary efficacy endpoint: expanded treatment in cerebral infarction score (eTICI) ≥2b revascularization within ≤ 3 stent retriever passes. Primary safety endpoint: monitoring serious adverse events within 24 h post-intervention and all-cause mortality at 90 days.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Román et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: