Key result
Angiogenesis inhibitors increase hypertension risk ~3.3-fold compared to control therapy in cancer patients.
Why the study?
Angiogenesis inhibitors are associated with significant cardiovascular toxicities that may increase when combined with other therapies, warranting an evaluation of the types, incidence, and severity of these adverse events.
Does angiogenesis inhibitor therapy increase major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with cancer?
Meta-Analysis (n=27,639)
Does angiogenesis inhibitor therapy increase major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with cancer?
Angiogenesis inhibitors significantly increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, including hypertension, myocardial ischemia, thrombosis, and left ventricular dysfunction in patients with cancer.
Angiogenesis inhibitors warrant close BP and cardiac monitoring in cancer patients; confirms elevated hypertension, ischemia, and LV dysfunction risks across 64 RCTs.
BACKGROUND: Angiogenesis inhibitors (AIs) are effective in cancer therapy due to their ability to suppress tumor vasculature. However, these agents are associated with significant cardiovascular toxicities, including hypertension, thrombosis, and heart failure, which may increase when combined with other cancer treatments, such as chemotherapy or immunotherapy. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the cardiovascular adverse events linked to AIs, focusing on their types, incidence, and severity of these adverse events to provide a clearer understanding of the cardiovascular risks associated with AIs. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted for randomized controlled trials that assessed AI therapies. The data from 64 studies involving 27 639 patients were analyzed using a random-effects model. Major adverse cardiovascular events such as hypertension, thrombosis, arrhythmias, myocardial ischemia, and left ventricular dysfunction were the primary outcomes. RESULTS: The analysis revealed that AI treatment significantly increased the incidence of hypertension (relative risk [RR], 3.28 [95% CI, 2.82-4.30]), myocardial ischemia or infarction events (RR, 2.09 [95% CI, 1.05-4.17]), arrhythmia events (RR, 1.25 [95% CI, 0.90-1.74]), thrombotic events (RR, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.11-1.92]), and left ventricular dysfunction (RR, 2.00 [95% CI, 1.18-3.41]). Subgroup analyses indicated that the combination of AIs with chemotherapy or other targeted therapies heightened these risks. CONCLUSIONS: AIs significantly increase the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with cancer, particularly when combined with other treatments. Clinicians should balance the benefits and cardiovascular risks of AIs and consider strategies to reduce these adverse effects. Further research is needed to refine these insights.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tao et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in Cancer (n=27,639). Angiogenesis inhibitors vs. Control (chemotherapy alone, placebo, hormone therapy alone, or other targeted therapy alone) was evaluated on Hypertension events (RR 3.28, 95% CI 2.82-4.30, p=<0.001). Angiogenesis inhibitors significantly increased the incidence of hypertension compared to control treatments in patients with cancer (22.4% vs 6.6%; RR 3.28).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: