The Case Against “The Case Against the Catheter”: Initial Report

No AccessJournal of Urology1 Jun 1969The Case Against “The Case Against the Catheter”: Initial Report Patrick D. Guinan, Bruce C. Bayley, William I. Metzger, William C. Shoemaker, and Irving M. Bush Patrick D. GuinanPatrick D. Guinan More articles by this author , Bruce C. BayleyBruce C. Bayley More articles by this author , William I. MetzgerWilliam I. Metzger More articles by this author , William C. ShoemakerWilliam C. Shoemaker More articles by this author , and Irving M. BushIrving M. Bush More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)62452-2AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail © 1969 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byKeys R, Spreen S and Evans A (2018) An Unusual Complication from a Functioning Indwelling Urethral Catheter: Case Report of an Abdominal MassJournal of Urology, VOL. 116, NO. 2, (257-258), Online publication date: 1-Aug-1976. Volume 101Issue 6June 1969Page: 909-913 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1969 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Patrick D. Guinan More articles by this author Bruce C. Bayley More articles by this author William I. Metzger More articles by this author William C. Shoemaker More articles by this author Irving M. Bush More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...