Parallel linear defects which are inclined to the sample surface normal and crossed linear defects are introduced into DyBa₂{Cu}₃O_7-δ and Bi₂{Sr}₂CaCu₂{O}_{8+{{δ}}}$ single crystals by high-energy heavy-ion irradiation. The dependence of flux penetration on temperature, fluence, and applied external magnetic field is investigated before and after irradiation. For crossed linear defects much higher pinning than for parallel defects with the same density is observed for both materials. This finding is attributed to the intersections of linear defects which allow the flux lines to be more effectively pinned than by parallel defects. In this case flux-line depinning occurs by kink-pair nucleation in the sample volume as in the Bose-glass model. From parallel linear defects the flux lines may be more easily depinned by nucleation of surface kinks. The observed low anisotropy j_∥/j_⊥{}2 of the critical current flowing parallel or perpendicular, respectively, to the inclination plane of the defects in parallel-irradiated DyBa₂{Cu}₃O_7-δ is explained by different geometrical arrangment of defects and flux lines in the directions of flux-line motion. During field decrease the anisotropy is found to disappear in samples with parallel linear defects. For crossed defects the anisotropy j_∥/j_⊥{}2 reverses in decreasing field since the flux lines are effectively pinned only in the inclination plane of the linear defects. In Bi₂{Sr}₂CaCu₂{O}_{8+{{δ}}}$ single crystals the flux penetration is isotropic; this is understood from the pancake-vortex model. The different observations in ${DyBa}₂Cu₃{O}_{7{{-}}{{δ}}}$ and ${Bi}₂Sr₂{CaCu}₂O_8+δ single crystals are in good agreement with a recently given scaling approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schuster et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: