Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
One goal of this work was to develop a reproducible method of preparing high quality Y-Ba-Cu-O superconducting films and to study their properties versus thickness. This was accomplished by rf diode sputtering from a single target. Twenty-seven depositions were made using a target containing 8.9-at. % Y, 37.3-at. % Ba, and 53.8-at. % Cu. Film thicknesses ranged from 0.09 to 2.4 μm. The film compositions obtained were 15.6±1.0-at. % Y, 35.8±1.0-at. % Ba, and 48.7±1.7-at. % Cu for the mean and standard deviation. The films were amorphous as-deposited and crystallized by annealing in O2 at 915 °C. X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy indicated that, on (100)SrTiO3 substrates, films with thickness less than ∼0.25 μm were epitaxially oriented with their c axis perpendicular to the substrate. Films on (110)SrTiO3 were oriented with their c axis parallel to the substrate. On (100)SrTiO3, zero resistance was achieved in 30 samples from 27 runs at 85.6±1.4 K with a transition width (10%–90%) of 1.8±1.1 K independent of thickness. Results for deposition on a variety of other substrates were more variable. Diamagnetic shielding of up to 38% was calculated from the initial slope of M vs H. This low value was attributed to the presence of second phases and a significant diffusion layer thickness, both observed by transmission electron microscopy. Critical currents, measured by transport using a four-point probe, reached 8.1×105 A/cm2 at 77.35 K for a 0.2-μm film deposited on (100)SrTiO3 . Comparable values were obtained by calculation from the M-H hysteresis loop, from which we infer that there are either continuous epitaxial sheets of c axis oriented 123 or, if there are grain boundaries, the coupling across them is strong.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luborsky et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: