Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We first assessed the neuroprotective efficacy of mild hypothermia (35°C/24 hours) alone and in combination with magnesium (intravenous loading dose: 360 μmol/kg; 48 hours infusion: 120 μmol/kg/h) commencing 4 hours after global ischemia. Treatment with mild hypothermia alone (CA1 survival rate: 8.7%±0.9%) or with magnesium (9.0%±2.9%) did not significantly increase hippocampal CA1 neuronal survival compared with saline-treated controls (7.1%±0.7%). Next, we assessed mild hypothermia (35°C/24 hours) and moderate hypothermia (33°C/24 hours), alone or in combination with magnesium, when commenced 2 hours after global ischemia. At this time point, all treatments significantly increased CA1 neuronal survival compared with saline controls (CA1 survival rates: mild hypothermia: 13.6%±1.8%; mild hypothermia + magnesium: 19.4%±8.7%; moderate hypothermia: 15.9%±4.1%; moderate hypothermia + magnesium: 21.1%±11.2%; saline control: 6.7%±1.6%; p<0.001). Although a trend for increased neuroprotection was observed when hypothermia was combined with magnesium, it did not reach statistical significance. It also appears that when a 24-hour hypothermia treatment is commenced earlier (≤2 hours postischemia) there is no difference in efficacy between mild and moderate hypothermia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: