It is a rather striking paradox that the most dramatic of all vascular accidents is seldom recognized ante mortem. There have been almost 500 cases dealing with rupture of the aorta reported in the literature, and in only nine¹instances has a correct antemortem diagnosis been made. Swaine,1aMager,²Davy and Gates,³Hirschboeck and Boman,⁴Moosberger,⁵Vaughan,⁶Kellogg and Heald,⁷White,⁸and Weiss⁹are listed as having correctly diagnosed cases. Wyss¹⁰is said to have diagnosed a case, but it seems from his statement that a saccular aneurysm was suspected rather than a dissecting aneurysm, as is also true in the cases of Osler¹¹and Finney.¹² We are reporting three cases in which a correct antemortem diagnosis was made, bringing the total number to twelve, which is far short of those in which a diagnosis could have
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
T.English McGeachy (1937) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: