Key result
Manual reflexology treatment significantly improved sleep quality, insomnia severity, fatigue, and autonomic balance compared to mechanical foot massage in adults with poor sleep quality.
Why the study?
Does manual reflexology treatment improve sleep quality, insomnia, fatigue, and autonomic function in adults with poor sleep quality compared to foot massage equipment?
RCT (n=32)
crossover
Does manual reflexology treatment improve sleep quality, insomnia, fatigue, and autonomic function in adults with poor sleep quality compared to foot massage equipment?
Manual reflexology treatment is more effective than mechanical foot massage in improving autonomic balance, sleep quality, insomnia severity, and fatigue in individuals with poor sleep quality.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Manual reflexology outperforms equipment-based massage for sleep quality and HRV; supports its preference in clinical insomnia care and larger comparative trials.
Poor sleep quality is closely associated with autonomic dysregulation and increased risks of cardiovascular, metabolic, and mental disorders. Foot reflexology is a widely used complementary therapy; however, its physiological mechanisms and comparative efficacy remain insufficiently explored. This study aimed to compare the effects of manual reflexology treatment (MRT) and foot massage equipment (FEM) on autonomic nervous system function, sleep quality, insomnia severity, and fatigue in adults with poor sleep quality. Using a randomized crossover design, 32 participants with poor sleep quality received MRT and FEM interventions for 6 weeks each (once weekly, 30-40 min/session). Heart rate (HR), blood pressure, and heart rate variability (HRV; time- and frequency-domain indices) were assessed at weeks 1 and 6 before and after each intervention. Subjective outcomes included the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS). Following MRT, participants demonstrated significantly greater reductions in global PSQI scores and all PSQI components compared with FEM. MRT also resulted in larger improvements in insomnia severity and both mental and physical fatigue. In contrast, FEM primarily improved physical fatigue. Physiologically, MRT induced an immediate decrease in HR and significant increases in HRV time-domain indices (SDNN, RMSSD, pNN50), which were sustained after 6 weeks. Frequency-domain analysis further revealed reduced LF, increased HF, and a lower LF/HF ratio, indicating enhanced parasympathetic activity and cumulative autonomic modulation. In conclusion, programmed manual reflexology, delivered according to the TIDieR framework, is more effective than mechanical foot massage in improving autonomic balance, sleep quality, insomnia severity, and fatigue in individuals with poor sleep quality. These findings support MRT as a feasible and evidence-based non-pharmacological complementary intervention for sleep health promotion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov; NCT Number: NCT07402460; Registered 3 February 2026.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in poor sleep quality (n=32). Manual reflexology treatment (MRT) vs. Foot massage equipment (FEM) was evaluated on Autonomic nervous system function, sleep quality, insomnia severity, and fatigue. Manual reflexology treatment significantly improved sleep quality, insomnia severity, fatigue, and autonomic balance compared to mechanical foot massage in adults with poor sleep quality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: