Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper introduces the formalism which connects between rotation measure (RM) measurements for extragalactic sources and the cosmological magnetic field power spectrum. It is shown that the amplitude and shape of the cosmological magnetic field power spectrum can be constrained by using a few hundred radio sources, for which Faraday RMs are available. This constraint is of the form B rms ≲ 1 × (2.6 × 10 -7 cm −3 / b ]) h nG on ~10-50 h -1 Mpc scales, with b the average baryon density and h the Hubble parameter in units of 100 km s -1 Mpc -1 . The constraint is superior to and supersedes any other constraint that comes from either cosmic microwave background (CMB) fluctuations, baryonic nucleosynthesis, or the first two multipoles of the magnetic field expansion. The most adequate method for the constraint calculation uses the Bayesian approach to the maximum likelihood function. I demonstrate the ability to detect such magnetic fields by constructing simulations of the field and mimicking observations. This procedure also provides error estimates for the derived quantities. The two main noise contributions due to the Galactic RM and the internal RM are treated in a statistical way following an evaluation of their distribution. For a range of magnetic field power spectra with power indices -1 ≤ n ≤ 1 in a flat cosmology (Ω m = 1) we estimate the signal-to-noise ratio, Q , for limits on the magnetic field B rms on a ~50 h -1 Mpc scale. Employing one patch of a few square degrees on the sky with source number density n src , an approximate estimate yields Q ≃ 3( B rms /1 nG)( n src /50 deg -2 )(2.6 × 10 -7 cm −3 / b ) h . An all-sky coverage, with a much sparser but carefully tailored sample of ~500 sources, yields Q ≃ 1 with the same scaling. An ideal combination of small densely sampled patches and sparse all-sky coverage yields Q ≃ 3 with better constraints for the power index. All of these estimates are corroborated by the simulations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 1998 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: